Legal Opinion

United States v. Evett

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 2, 1946No. Cr. No. 9516PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELSH, District Judge.

Defendant, Lawrence Evett, made a motion for a new trial upon the ground of misconduct with relation to the jury. It was supported by affidavits to the effect that a United States Narcotic Agent and a Deputy United States Marshall made statements in the corridor of the fourth floor of the Federal building in Sacramento which could have been heard by a juror before the case was submitted to the jury.

Said alleged statements related to an attempt by said defendant to escape from custody and intimidation of a witness by force and threats during the noon recess.

Counter-affidav…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Sheehan v. HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  3. Union Electric Light & Power Co. v. Snyder Estate Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1936
  4. Crawford v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. RedfieldDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1961
  2. United States v. StoneU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
  3. United States v. Joseph Frank BrumbaughCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Joseph Frank BrumbaughCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API