Legal Opinion

Vogel v. City of Antigo

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Langlade County. The facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtOetoN, J.

This appeal is from the order denying the motion of the defendant to dismiss the appeal taken by the plaintiif from the action of the common council disallowing her claim for damages occasioned by the dangerous and defective condition of a sidewalk in said city, on the grounds that it was taken without authority of law and that the court has no jurisdiction of the defendant or the subject of the action.

This is the case: On the 22d day of July, 1890, the re*643spondent filed with the clerk of tbe city of Antigo a notice, addressed to the mayor and common council of said city, setting forth the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sheel v. City of AppletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Kelley v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Watson v. City of AppletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Plano Manufacturing Co. v. RaseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Bradley v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pulitzer v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Sommers v. City of MarshfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Van Frachen v. City of Fort HowardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Appleton Water Works Co. v. City of AppletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Gruetzmacher v. WannigerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API