Gruetzmacher v. Wanniger
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Kewaunee ■county: Michael Kiewaw, Circuit Judge. Eor the appellant there was a brief signed by Wing & Wat-tawa, attorneys, and Nash & Nash, of counsel, and oral argument by A. L. Nash.
1Opinion of the CourtCassodat, C. J.
It appears from the record, in effect, that November 4, 1898, the plaintiff leased to the defendant eight acres of land described, for as long a time as might be necessary to raise and harvest a crop of peas thereon for the season of 1899; the plaintiff to plow the ground and sow the same with peas to be furnished by the defendant, who was to have the direction of the time and manner of doing such work, and have the right to enter the. premises at any time he saw fit for the purpose of such supervision and the raising and harvesting of the crop; and he was to pay to the plaintiff for such…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Telford v. City of AshlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Plano Manufacturing Co. v. RaseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
- Oshkosh Water Works Co. v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Seegar v. City of AshlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Bullard v. KuhlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Skinkis v. TreffertCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Aneta Mercantile Co. v. GrosethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Norwich Pharmacal Co. v. AbalyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- State ex rel. Teaching Assistants Ass'n v. University of Wisconsin-MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.