Legal Opinion

Fink v. Fraenkle

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 24, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term. Action by Frederick W. Fink and others against Rudolph Fraenkle. Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion to punish defendant, against whom they had recovered a judgment, execution on which had been returned unsatisfied, for refusing to deliver to a receiver, appointed in proceedings supplementary to execution against him, certain property owned by him.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Wyck, J.

The plaintiff issued an execution against the property of defendant, which was duly returned unsatisfied, whereupon he obtained an order in supplementary proceedings for the examination of defendant, and upon his examination the judgment debtor testified that he was a physician in active practice; lived at 115 Second street; was unmarried; had no children; and owned a set of furniture for his waiting room, a set for his bedroom, a library of about 200 volumes, and his surgical instruments; and that all his furniture was worth about $200, and the surgical instruments about $150; and that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kneettle v. . NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re FrenchDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1916
  2. In re CondonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1912
  3. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API