Haeberle v. University of Louisville
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
GWIN,
United States District Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part.
Respectfully, I concur, in part, and I dissent, in part. As described below, I believe the Court reaches the correct result regarding Haeberle’s due process and First Amendment claims, although not because he failed to file this action within the statute of limitations. Instead, I find that he fails to show a protected interest in continued employment. With regard to the Court’s discussion of the application of the statute of limitations to Haeberle’s claims, I believe the Court’s opinion is wrong regarding two…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alan Weiner, D.P.M. v. Klais and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.