Legal Opinion

Dunne v. Minsor

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1924No. 15883PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Appellant, as bishop of the Catholic church of the diocese of Peoria, filed a bill in the circuit court of Henry county to construe the wills of James Quirk and Mary Quirk, deceased. The question involved in this case is whether these wills create a condition subsequent or a covenant. Of the will of James Quirk clause 16 is the one involved, and is as follows:

“Sixteenth — I give and devise my homestead where I now reside, in Kewanee, Illinois, at the intersection of South and Chestnut streets, on lots ten (10) and eleven (11) and a portion of lot twelve (12), in block eleven (11), of Tenney’s…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Stanley v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Finlay v. King's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  3. Nicoll v. . the New-York and Erie Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. Post v. . WeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Williams v. VanderbiltIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Peck v. DrennanIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Henry v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
  3. In Re Estate of NugenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  4. Colgan v. Sisters of St. Joseph of CarondeletAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Mahrenholz v. County Board of School TrusteesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API