Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Estes Alexander

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1919No. 984PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Taylor County Court; E. M. Overshiner, Judge. Action by Estes & Alexander against James Ferguson, John Ferguson, and another. Citation not having been served on the first-named defendant, the cause was dismissed as to him, and, from a judgmén't for plaintiffs against the remaining defendants, they appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellees filed this petition on August 8, 1916, in the county court of Taylor county, against James and John Ferguson and J. W. Cornelius, to recover upon an open account for medical services, etc., rendered in January and February, 1915, to the wife of James Ferguson, which services were rendered at the request of all defendants and for the payment of which they all became liable. After service of citation in November, 1917, defendants John Ferguson and Cornelius pleaded the two-year statute of limitation. This plea was predicated upon the theory that more than two years had elapsed before…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ricker, Lee & Co. v. ShoemakerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Wood & Kinkaid v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. Estes v. McWhorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Buie v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. First State Bank & Trust Co. v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Brooks v. CookMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. City of Gainesville v. HarderTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Austin v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API