Legal Opinion
Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Hubbard
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 20, 1916No. 1080PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
The following statement of the nature and result of the suit is adopted from appellee’s brief:
“Appellee, B. A. Hubbard, brought this'suit in the county court, August 28, 1915, against appellants, the Panhandle & Santa Fé and the Texas & Pacific Railway Companies, for alleged damages to an automobile shipped by him from Plainview to Weatherford, Tex., on October 7, 1913, consigned to H. G. Gilbert, alleging that the damages occurred in transit, and the damages being the loss of a great number of parts and injury to two parts to the extent of worthlessness; that the reasonable market value at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ricker, Lee & Co. v. ShoemakerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Elder, Dempster & Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
- Wood & Kinkaid v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Estes v. McWhorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ferguson v. Estes AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Allen v. MastersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Godshalk v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- McDonald v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Landers v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.