Coggswell v. Davis
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Roelc County. The action was brought to recover the purchase price of cream alleged to have been sold and delivered to the defendants as partners. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Roelc County. The action was brought to recover the purchase price of cream alleged to have been sold and delivered to the defendants as partners. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. They contended, inter al/ia, that the admission of improper evidence is fatal to the verdict and judgment, unless the jury were positively directed to disregard it; and even then the error will not be cured if it appears that their verdict was in any way affected by it. /State Bcvnlc v. Button, 11 Wis. 371; Johnson They argued, among other things: 1. The admission…
1Opinion of the CourtTaylob, J.
This action was commenced in justice’s court by the respondent against' W. J. Davis, D. J. Dams, and Thomas Rankin as defendants. The action was commenced by attachment on the Ith of March, 1884, and, there being-no personal service upon either of the defendants, after due publication as required by law, judgment was entered in favor of the respondent against all the defendants, on the 2d day of April, 1884.. The complaint alleged that all the' defendants were partners, and were indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $151.82.
On the 9th day of April the defendants D. J. Dmis and Thomas Rankin…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Champion v. DotyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Benjamin v. CovertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- Benjamin v. CovertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by8 opinions
- Guild v. MoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- McDermott v. JacksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Castenholz v. HellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Driscoll v. Allis-Chalmers Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Arnold v. HartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.