Legal Opinion

Enserch Corp. v. Houston Oil & Minerals Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 29, 1987No. 01-86-0240-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVY, Justice.

The issue presented here is whether the trial judge correctly determined that the price term in the parties’ gas purchase contract provides for the buyer’s payment of severance taxes and the buyer’s payment of monthly escalations allowed under the Natural Gas Policy Act [“NGPA”]. We hold that, under the particular facts of this case, the trial judge was correct in concluding that the buyer, Lone Star, a division of Enserch Corporation, was contractually responsible for payment of the monthly NGPA price, but incorrect in concluding that Enserch was contractually obligated for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stahl Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pennzoil Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Stahl Petroleum Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Parker v. DelcoureCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Palmer v. Liles, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Enserch Corp. v. Rebich, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1996
  2. Edwards v. Lone Star Gas Co. Div Enserch Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Intratex Gas Co. v. Puckett, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
  4. Edwards v. Lone Star Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Edwards v. Lone Star Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API