Schram v. Goldsmith
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
Plaintiff, as receiver of the First National Bank-Detroit, secured a deficiency decree of $3,652.14 against Rose Aronofsky in the United States court for the eastern district of Michigan and' subsequently filed a claim based thereon against her estate in the probate court for Wayne county. The claim was duly allowed. In the claim filed, the estate is described as that of Rose Aronofsky, alias Rose Aronovsky, Aronowsky, or Minkovsky, deceased. The deficiency judgment had been rendered against Rose Aronofsky. In the petition to appeal to the circuit court signed by Dr. Goldsmith, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miskiewicz v. SmolenskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Cook v. VineyardMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- In re Turner's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1922