Legal Opinion

Schram v. Goldsmith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1944No. Docket No. 6, Calendar No. 41,694Published

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Plaintiff, as receiver of the First National Bank-Detroit, secured a deficiency decree of $3,652.14 against Rose Aronofsky in the United States court for the eastern district of Michigan and' subsequently filed a claim based thereon against her estate in the probate court for Wayne county. The claim was duly allowed. In the claim filed, the estate is described as that of Rose Aronofsky, alias Rose Aronovsky, Aronowsky, or Minkovsky, deceased. The deficiency judgment had been rendered against Rose Aronofsky. In the petition to appeal to the circuit court signed by Dr. Goldsmith, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miskiewicz v. SmolenskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Cook v. VineyardMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. In re Turner's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API