Legal Opinion

People v. Rohrer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1894PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to St. Joseph. (Loveridge, J.) Argued February 2, 1894. Decided April 17, 1894. Respondent was convicted of keeping his saloon open on Sunday. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The respondent appeals from a conviction of keeping bis saloon open on Sunday. Joined with this charge, in another count, was a charge of keeping his windows curtained during the same day. Evidence was admitted tending to prove both charges; and the jury acquitted him of the latter, and convicted him of the former, charge.

The doctrine is well settled in this State that a. person should not be subjected to trial for two separate and distinct offenses at one time. This rule is applied to eases of felony in most, if not all, of the states, and' has been applied to misdemeanors in Michigan.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. JennesMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Tiedke v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. TobeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. AndrusMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. CzckayMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. OrmsbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. People v. ShulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API