Swetland Building Co. v. Children's Home
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
The special assessment ■ was levied upon the property by virtue of an ordinance ordained since the lease was entered into. In fact, the city charter did not at that time authorize the city to levy a special assessment against property for street lighting. Both parties proceed upon the theory that, if the special assessment for the ornamental lighting is included within the terms of “sidewalk” and “street assessments” as used in the modified lease, then plaintiff is liable to pay the assessment. Defendant also contends that by the terms of the lease it is liable for no taxes, either general or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- J. W. Perry Co. v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- President of Harvard College v. Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Codman v. American Piano Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Suter v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Park Building Co. v. George P. Yost Fur Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Manheim Township Supervisors v. WorkmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Genest v. John Glenn CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Russell v. Sealed Power Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Walling Warehouse Co. v. Springhill Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Genest v. John Glenn CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1985