Legal Opinion

Branham v. Hallam

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 20, 1916No. 5751PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwearingen, J.

Tbis is a suit by ap-pellee, M. S. I-Iallam, against appellants, Mrs. Ruth Branham and husband, H. H. Bran-ham, to recover reasonable compensation for services rendered unto appellants in connection with the partition of the estate of Valentine Weiss, valued at $1,500,000. The services were rendered in pursuance of an express employment. Appellants admitted the employment for services in connection with the partition, but averred the value thereof was only $1,500. The cause was tried with a jury, to which was submitted the single issue of the value of the services rendered in connection with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Watkins v. JunkerTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Moore v. PiersonTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Eagle Manufacturing Co. v. HanawayTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. HapgoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Abilene St. Ry. Co. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. A a a Air Conditioning & Mfg. Corp. v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Kramer v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API