Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Stanbridge v. Quinlan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 26, 1984No. 83 Civ. 6469(MEL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
Petitioner William Stanbridge moves for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1982) on the grounds that his parole was wrongfully revoked and that his sentence has been erroneously calculated, resulting in continuing imprisonment beyond his proper release date. The petition is denied.
I
In 1974, while on state parole from sentences imposed in 1962, Stanbridge was convicted of conspiracy to distribute narcotics and sentenced to seven years in federal custody. He was paroled to a state detain-er on September 29,1976 and spent 82 days in state custody for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Otis G. Weeks, Jr. v. J. Michael Quinlan, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- William Miller v. J. Hadden, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Douglas Lachance v. Janet Reno, in Her Capacity as Attorney General of the United States, and the United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Troia v. WigginDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989