Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Shirey

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided January 13, 1944No. Civil Action No. 63PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DELEHANT, District Judge.

In this action for recovery of a money judgment (for treble the amount of excess consideration) against the defendant for his alleged violation of Revised Maximum Price Regulation No. 169, Beef and Veal Carcasses and Wholesale Cuts, as amended (7 Fed. Reg. 4653), issued pursuant to the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, U.S. C.A., Title 50 Appendix § 901 et seq., in the sale of ungraded wholesale beef carcasses, sides, hindquarters and forequarters at prices exceeding the maximum prices therefor, the defendant within Rule 12(b) (6), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. Tahir Erk v. Glenn L. Martin Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  3. Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  4. Sparks v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  5. Brauch v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowles v. OhseDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API