Legal Opinion

Yablon v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation Fee Review Hearing Office

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 2011No. 2042 C.D. 2010PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge PELLEGRINI.

Jeffrey Yablon, M.D. and Vincent Fer-rara, M.D. (collectively, Providers) appeal the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation Fee Review Hearing Office’s (Hearing Officer) determination that PMA (Insurer), a workers’ compensation insurer, did not lose the right to “downcode” charges because more than 30 days had passed after their bill had been submitted. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

This case stems from vertebral axial decompression (VAX-D) treatment provided by Providers to two workers’ compensation claimants. Both Providers billed the VAX-D treatment using CPT…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Bureau of Workers' Compensation Fee Review Hearing OfficeCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bureau of Workers' CompensationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Com. v. Young, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Com. v. Young, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Com. v. Henneghan, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Liberty Mut. Ins. v. WORKERS'COMPENSATIONCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API