State v. Parker
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTLEY, Justice.
A jury convicted Randy Alan Parker of forcible rape. On appeal, Parker argues the district court erred in admitting the prosecutrix’s taped statement made between two and three hours after the alleged rape. Parker further argues the district court erred in barring evidence of his character for the trait of sexual non-ag*2gression towards women and the victim’s admission that she left home the day before the alleged rape because she was pregnant.
The case arises from the following facts: The fourteen-year-old victim was walking alone on a road near Lake Lowell one evening at…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Isaacson v. ObendorfIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. BattilanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- State v. RandolphArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. RandolphArizona Supreme Court · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. FieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. ZimmermanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. LavalleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- State v. PeiteIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.