Bock Associates v. Chronister
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROGERS, District Judge.
This ease is now before the court upon defendant’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint.
I. PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS
The first amended complaint alleges that plaintiff contracted with the State of Kansas to perform “preadmission screening and resident review” (“PASARR”) services for the state’s Medicaid program. Of course, Medicaid is funded with state and federal money, and there are state and federal regulations governing the program. PASARR is a federal requirement. The goals of the requirement are: to ensure that only legally eligible…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Joseph S. v. HoganDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Sanders ex rel. Rayl v. Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Sanders Ex Rel. Rayl v. KANSAS DEPT. OF SOCIAL AND REHABIL. SERVICESDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Green v. City of Wichita, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Russo v. School BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.