Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance v. Gee
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Connolly, Thomas E., J.
The plaintiff, Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Hingham Mutual), brought this action against the defendants, Michael Gee, Qi Ming Zhang, Wan Xing Gee, and Wanna Ma Gee, individually and as next friend of Edwin Gee and Jennifer Gee, for a declaratory judgment that Hingham Mutual has no contractual duty to: (1) defend Michael Gee and Qi Ming Zhang against Wan Xing Gee, Wanna Ma Gee, Edwin Gee, and Jennifer Gee’s claims or (2) pay Wan Xing Gee, Wanna Ma Gee, Edwin Gee, and Jennifer Gee’s claims. This matter is before the Court on Hingham Mutual’s motion for summary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Hakim v. Massachusetts Insurers' Insolvency FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Bilodeau v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.