Resop v. LaManna

SCHEB, Judge.

The appellant/defendant, W. Paul Resop, seeks reversal of the trial court’s judgment awarding the appellee, Richard G. La-Manna, one-half of a real estate sales commission paid to appellant by John Barger.1 We refer to the appellant as Resop, the ap-pellee as LaManna and to John Barger as Barger.

LaManna’s action against Resop was based upon an alleged oral contract to share commissions arising out of the sale of Barger’s motel. The parties were both experienced real estate brokers who had previous business dealings together. La-Manna had sold twenty to forty parcels of real…