Legal Opinion
Mangus v. Present
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 7, 1961No. 40013PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
135 So.2d 417 (1961)
Leslie J. MANGUS, Petitioner,
v.
Art PRESENT, trading and doing business as Art Present Realty, Respondent.
No. 40013.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 7, 1961.
Rehearing Denied September 7, 1961.
Hylan H. Kout, Miami Beach, for petitioner.
Snyder, Young & Stern, North Miami Beach, for respondent.
2Per curiam
Leslie Mangus, petitioner, will hereinafter be referred to as Mangus; Art Present, trading and doing business as Art Present Realty, respondent, will hereinafter be referred to as Art Present. Mangus and Art Present were both in the real estate business. Mangus was plaintiff below and Art…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- The City of Miami Beach v. Ocean Inland Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Sunad, Inc. v. City of SarasotaSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
- Southern Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. ColeSupreme Court of Florida · 1852
- Henderson v. KendrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
- Geo. W. Robinson & Co. v. Hyer Bros.Supreme Court of Florida · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Company v. KrasnekSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- Wright & Seaton, Inc. v. PrescottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- George B. Dickinson v. Auto Center Manufacturing Company and John W. McLeodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- In re Standard Jury Instructions—Contract & Business CasesSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Fontainbleau Hotel Corp. And Babs, Inc. v. Florence Lustig Crossman, Florence Lustig Crossman v. Fontainbleau Hotel Corp. And Babs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.