Davis v. Godart
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $6,200 paid by plaintiff on account of the purchase of land. The case was tried before Brill, J., who granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the action on the ground that the complaint did not state a cause of action. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Pee CubiaM.
Action by the plaintiff to recover of the defendants upon a provision in a contract for the sale of lands, whereby they agreed to return to him the purchase price paid by him at his option at the end of one year from the date of the contract. The court sustained defendants’ objection to the introduction of any testimony under the complaint and dismissed the action. Plaintiff moved for a new trial and his motion was denied. From the order denying it he appeals.
*2221. TJnder date of October 4, 1912, the defendants as vendors and the plaintiff as vendee entered into a contract for the sale…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rogers v. BurrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Smith v. ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- McDougall v. O'ConnellWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Jensen v. Williams Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Maier v. RebstockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stull v. HicksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Matson v. BaumanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Central Guarantee Co. v. National Bank of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Reitz v. BrouhardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Krause v. Union Match Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.