Legal Opinion

Central Guarantee Co. v. National Bank of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1925No. 19547. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

On August 4, 1920, the respondent, The National Bank of Tacoma, entered into a subscription contract with the appellant, Central Guarantee Company, reading as follows:

“City of Tacoma, Wash., 8/4/1920
“Central Guarantee Company

Fifth Avenue Bldg.,

New York City, N. Y.

“Please send to our address for 5 years Special Mercantile Edition of The Merchants ’ Bank Directory and List of Guaranteed Attorneys, for which we will pay the sum of 100.00 Dollars per year on receipt of first copy following date of contract, and annually thereafter. Subscription commences 1-1-21. Subscription ends 1-1-2G.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ide v. LeiserMontana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Black v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Lawrence v. PedersonWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. I. X. L. Furniture & Carpet Installment House v. BeretsUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Rogers v. BurrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. FairleighCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  2. Bennett's, Inc. v. KroghSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  3. Mayhew v. VanwayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Music, Inc. v. Henry B. Klein Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Prison Health Services, Inc. v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API