Durden-Powers Co. v. O'Brien
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
This is not a case involving the admissibility of parol evidence to alter, vary, or contradict a written instrument, which is forbidden by the Civil Code (1910), § 5788. The judgment was upon a demurrer to the petition; and the facts which are relied upon in the effort to show a deed executed and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant was not an absolute conveyance, but rather a security for debt and in effect an equitable mortgage, are contained in written contracts incorporated in the pleadings. For this reason we are of the opinion that the contention of learned counsel for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mercer v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Berry v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Gould v. BarrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Waller v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bowman v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Clements v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Manget Realty Co. v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Seay v. MaloneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Clarke v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949