Legal Opinion

Anderson v. City of Tea

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2006No. 23949PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Retired Justice.

[¶ 1.] In this appeal we affirm the circuit court and hold that petitions seeking to bring a municipal ordinance to a public vote do not conform to statutory requirements.

[¶ 2.] Deb Anderson objected to a resolution adopted by the City of Tea that required the construction of sidewalks along various streets and avenues in the municipality. She and others circulated petitions among the residents of Tea attempting to refer the resolution to a public vote. The petitions were filed with the city finance officer, but rejected for failure to conform with statutory formatting…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Moss v. GuttormsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. US West Communications, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Morford v. PyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Baker v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McKittrick v. McKittrickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Zubke v. Melrose TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Johnson v. Powder River TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API