Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 2016No. 2015-1639PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Kierra Loree Smith of London, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0083862, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 2008. On April 28, 2015, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Smith with multiple violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct arising from her failure to attend a scheduled custody hearing on behalf of her client, her failure to properly withdraw from the representation, and her initial failure to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigation.

{¶ 2} A panel of the Board of Professional Conduct considered the cause on the parties’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. BallouOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. LeneghanOhio Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Erie-Huron Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bailey and Bailey (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Schriver (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association v. Hackerd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. AveryOhio Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API