Legal Opinion

Mills v. Theriault

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 29, 1985No. File FA17-645PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaloney, J.

The plaintiff in this case is the guardian of Daniel Theriault, appointed pursuant to the provisions of chapter 777 of the General Statutes. The defendant is the natural father of Daniel. The plaintiff brings this action under General Statutes § 46b-215 to recover amounts expended for the child’s support.

On the basis of the stipulation of the parties, testimony and other evidence introduced at the hearing, the court finds the following facts. Daniel was born on February 26,1967. The marriage between the defendant and Daniel’s mother was dissolved in 1979, and the court awarded custody of him…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  2. Town of Plainville v. Town of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker v. Baker, No. Fa86-0322610 (Sep. 18, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
  2. In Interest of Jessica M., (Dec. 16, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
  3. Jackson v. Jackson, No. 30 50 41 J (Aug. 28, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API