Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Curtis
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari; from Muscogee superior court — Judge Gilbert. December 17, 1913.
1Opinion of the CourtWade, J.
1. The eflect of the Carmack amendment to the Hepburn act was to give to the Federal jurisdiction control over interstate commerce. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Robinson, 233 U. S. 173 (34 Sup. Ct. 556); Kansas City Southern R. Co. v. Carl, 227 U. S. 639 (33 Sup. Ct. 391, 57 L. ed. 683) ; Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. Harriman, *717227 U. S. 657 (33 Sup. Ct. 39, 57 L. ed. 690) ; Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Cramer, 232 U. S. 490 (34 Sup. Ct. 383); Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Thomasville Live Stock Co., 13 Ga. App. 102 (78 S. E. 1019). These decisions determine the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. CramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Seattle Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. LukeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Myers v. Atlantic Greyhound LinesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Edenton Cotton Mills v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. O'Neill Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.