Legal Opinion

Kostenbader v. Schoeneck Farms, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1938No. Appeal 53PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadteeld, J.,

This is an action in assumpsit to recover $675 damages for an alleged breach of an oral contract of employ ment, together with the additional sum of $367.80, representing a claim for mileage and use by plaintiff of his automobile in fulfilling the duties of his employment. The latter claim was admitted in the pleadings and judgment entered therefor, leaving the former claim alone in dispute between the parties.

The plaintiff filed a statement of claim wherein he averred, with reference to the employment contract, that on March 15, 1935, he entered into the employ of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weidman v. United Cigar Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Trainer v. LairdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Hogle v. DeLong Hook & Eye Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Jones v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Gaupin v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hand EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Hay v. Pittsburgh Lodge No. 46 Loyal Order of MooseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API