Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex parte William Keith Robey.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 29, 2014No. 1121399Published

1DissentMoore, Chief Justice

William Keith Robey petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus to order Judge Alfred Bahakel, Jefferson Circuit Court, to grant Robey’s application for in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status1 and to waive prepayment of the filing fee for a Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition seeking postconviction relief. This Court today denies Robey’s petition. For the reasons stated below, I dissent.

I. Facts and Procedural History

On June 13, 2013, Robey filed his fourth Rule 32 petition accompanied by an application for IFP status. Attached to the application was a report of the activity in Robey’s inmate…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Smith v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Ex Parte McNaughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Ex Parte CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Goldsmith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API