Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Travelers Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The complaint states a cause of action, at least for the amount of the disability benefits which had accrued and were unpaid at the time of the institution of the action. The order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and to vacate the attachment must, therefore, be affirmed, without consideration of the right of the plaintiff to recover the total value of the policy on the theory of anticipatory breach.

The order should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a motion by the defendant to reduce the amount of the attachment.

Present —…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kuhn v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941
  2. Gordon v. Continental Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. McCann v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Robbins v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API