Legal Opinion

Hankins v. Crain Automotive Holdings LLC

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided February 16, 2024No. 4:23-cv-01040Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION BARTON HANKINS PLAINTIFF v. CASE NO. 4:23-CV-01040-BSM CRAIN AUTOMOTIVE HOLDINGS, LLC DEFENDANT ORDER Crain Automotive Holdings’s denial of deferred compensation benefits to Barton Hankins is reversed and Crain is ordered to pay Hankins $4,977,209.02 and prejudgment interest from April 1, 2023, until Hankins’s claim is satisfied. I. BACKGROUND Hankins is Crain’s former Chief Operating Officer. Affidavit of Barton Hankins ¶ 2, Stipulated Administrative Record (“AR”) at 58. During Hankins’s time with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. John D. Craig v. The Pillsbury Non-Qualified Pension Plan General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. Knowlton v. Anheuser-Busch Companies Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API