Legal Opinion
John D. Craig v. The Pillsbury Non-Qualified Pension Plan General Mills, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 14, 2006No. 05-2211PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYE, Circuit Judge.
The Pillsbury Non-Qualified Pension Plan (Plan) appeals the district court’s 2 grant of summary judgment in favor of John Craig. The district court determined the Plan abused its discretion when it calculated Craig’s pension benefits without including certain bonuses he received in 2001. We affirm.
I
John Craig began working for Pillsbury in 1989 when a subsidiary of his employer, Grand Metropolitan, Inc. (GMI), acquired Pillsbury. He moved from New Jersey to Minnesota to work in Pillsbury’s tax department, performing tax services for both GMI and Pillsbury. He later became a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Beverly D. Woo v. Deluxe Corp., Hartford Life Insurance Co., Doing Business as Itt Hartford, Inc., Sued as Hartford Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Gideon Goldstein v. Johnson Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Whiteman Tire, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Donald R. Scribner v. Worldcom, Inc., a Georgia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Noonan v. Staples, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Midgett v. Washington Group International Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Beth Cosey v. The Prudential Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Gilliam v. Nevada Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Sznewajs v. U.S. Bancorp Amended & Restated Supplemental Benefits PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.