Legal Opinion

Schnitzel, Inc. v. Sorensen (In Re Sorensen)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 15, 2018No. NC-17-1152-FBTaPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FARIS, Bankruptcy Judge:

INTRODUCTION

Appellant Schnitzel, Inc., dba R & J Jewelry & Loan ("R & J"), appeals from the bankruptcy court's ruling prohibiting R & J from disposing of chapter 13 1 debtor Sydney Eileen Sorensen's pawned jewelry. R & J argues that the bankruptcy court erred because the jewelry was excluded from Ms. Sorensen's estate by § 541(b)(8), and she could not extend her right to redeem the property through the bankruptcy process. We AFFIRM.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

R & J is a licensed pawnbroker in the state of California. In March 2016, Ms. Sorensen pledged five pieces of jewelry as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. In Re: Robert McKnight Pardee Darlene Daigle-Pardee, Debtors. Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation v. Robert McKnight Pardee Darlene Daigle-PardeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Espinosa v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Great Lakes Higher Education Corp. v. Pardee (In Re Pardee)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harrison, Jr. v. KonfinoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API