Legal Opinion
Espinosa v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 10, 2008No. 06-16421PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion filed October 2, 2008 is amended as follows:
Page 14031, Line 32
After the sentence ending with “persuasive,” insert: “Rather, we agree with Judge Lundin that ‘Pardee and Andersen stand soundly for the better-reasoned principle that notice of how the Chapter 13 plan affects creditors’ rights is all that the Constitution, the Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Rules require to bind creditors to the provisions of a confirmed plan under § 1327(a).’ Keith M. Lundin, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy § 229.1 (3d ed.2000 & Supp.2004).”
Page 14031, Line 32
B…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- In Re Guidant Corp. Implantable DefibrillatorsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Donna Marie Walls, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n v. Blendheim (In Re Blendheim)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Ahmad McAdoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Nash v. Clark County District Attorney's Office (In Re Nash)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In re: Christopher Michael Marino and Valerie Margaret MarinoUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.