Rose v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
One of the questions for decision, as in Burnet v. Leininger, 285 U. S. 136, 52 S. Ct. 345, 76 L. Ed. 665, is whether an attempted gift by a partner of a portion of his partnership interest to members of bis family resulted in the donees becoming members of the firm, so as to relieve the donor of liability for income tax upon -the distributive share of profits growing out of the part conveyed, within the provisions of section 218 (a) of the Revenue Acts of 1921 (42 Stat. 245), 1924 and 1926 (26 USCA'§ 959 (a). There is also presented a question as in Commissioner of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Burnet v. LeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Woodworth v. KalesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. OldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jones v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Saenger v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Tracy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Hanson v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1950
- Hardymon v. GlennDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.