Legal Opinion

In Re Fenasci

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 20, 2009No. 2009-B-1665PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*935| ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM*

This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Michael A. Fenasci, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana.

FORMAL CHARGES

In a sworn statement to the ODC, Joel Merrick stated that beginning in the early 1990s he worked for respondent as a “runner” to solicit prospective clients in Plaquemines Parish.1 On November 30, 1997, Mr. Merrick entered into an employment contract with respondent’s law firm, Fenasci & Associates, whereby Mr. Merrick acted as an independent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. In Re FenasciSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API