Legal Opinion

Bowler v. Roos

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 13458PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an action for wrongful death. The deceased, Mrs. Bridget Bowler, a woman sixty-two years of age, was riding in an automobile driven by her son, Edward Bowler, when a collision occurred between the said automobile and one driven by defendant Larson for his employer, defendant Roos. The heirs of Mrs. Bowler, nine in number, joined in this action, and the jury returned a verdict in their favor in the sum of $7,000;. The evidence satisfactorily establishes negligence on the part of defendant Larson and contributory negligence on the part of Edward Bowler.

Counsel for defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bartolozzi v. MallegniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Bowen v. KizirianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cross v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Flores v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Perkins v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Lucas v. Mississippi Housing Authority No. 8Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Trefzer v. StilesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API