State v. Breech
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
Appellant (“Breech”) appeals his conviction and sentence for driving under the influence of alcohol (“DUI”), second offense. We reverse and remand for resentencing for DUI first offense.
Breech claims that the trial judge erred in refusing to grant a motion for directed verdict or in the alternative a new trial because the evidence was insufficient for the jury to find him guilty of DUI. We disagree.
In reviewing the refusal to grant a directed verdict, the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the State to determine whether there is any evidence, either direct or circumstantial,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- State v. SchrockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- Doe v. RD AND EDSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hinton v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole & Pardon ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- State v. CreechCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
- Multimedia Publishing of South Carolina, Inc. v. MullinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Spoone v. Newsome Chevrolet-BuickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- State v. ZulferCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.