Legal Opinion
United States v. Luciano
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 6, 2003No. 01-2318PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
Immediately after a buy-and-bust sting, government agents conducted a warrant-less search of defendant-appellant Raul Luciano’s “stash house” and found a sizable quantity of heroin, drug paraphernalia, and two 9mm handguns. Later, a two-count indictment issued, charging Luciano with possession with intent to distribute over 100 grams of heroin, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, see 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A).
Before the case went to trial, Luciano unsuccessfully moved to suppress the evidence…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- United States v. Pedro L. Castillo and Frank RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Torres-RosarioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- United States v. GoodeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Frank DuranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.