Legal Opinion

Edmonds v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 2, 2008No. Civil Action No. 06-1543 (CKK)Published

1Opinion of the Court

(2008)

BERLINER CORCORAN & ROWE LLP, Plaintiff,

v.

Mordechai ORIAN, et al., Defendants.

Civil Action No. 06-1543 (CKK).

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

July 2, 2008.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

This case arises out of a dispute over attorneys' fees. Plaintiff Berliner Corcoran & Rowe LLP ("BCR") represented Defendants Global Horizons, Inc. ("Global Horizons") and Mordechai Orian ("Orian") (collectively, "Global") in a matter still pending before the Department of Labor ("DOL"). BCR alleges that Global failed to pay a portion of BCR's attorney's fees…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  5. First Chicago International v. United Exchange Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API