Legal Opinion

Ford v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 6, 1972PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

On this appeal the State Accident Insurance Fund contends that the circuit court’s award for unscheduled permanent partial disability was too large. Its contention in substance is that the determinative factors are:(1) The plaintiff has returned to his pre-injury employment;(2) Plaintiff’s employer is well-satisfied with the quality of plaintiff’s work; and(3) Plaintiff is earning more money per hour than he was prior to his injury.

We agree that these facts are relevant, but not that they are necessarily determinative.

The claimant at the time of his injury was in his mid-30’s. He has an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Surratt v. Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Surratt v. Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. Wied v. Marion CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hawes v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McCarty v. Bear Creek Uranium Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Smith v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. England v. Thunderbird & Saif Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Chavez v. Memorial Hospital of Sweetwater CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API