Jantz v. Long Bell Petroleum Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
PONDER, Justice.
After a careful study of the record in this case, the oral arguments ad*823vanced on this appeal and the briefs filed in support thereof, we have arrived at the conclusion that the trial judge has correctly stated the facts, the law applicable thereto and correctly disposed of all the issues raised; and we, therefore, adopt his opinion as the opinion of this Court, viz.:
“These three plaintiffs, respectively, instituted these three jactitory actions, each one, respectively, claiming to be the owner of the tract of land described in his petition and allege that defendant is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lee v. GiauqueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Long-Bell Petroleum Co. v. TriticoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- In Re Mt. Forest Fur Farms of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Allison v. MarounSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Connell v. Muslow Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daigle v. Pan American Production Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Hodges v. Long-Bell Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
- Lawton v. AnthonyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Collins v. Hunter Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Hodges v. Long-Bell Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960