Legal Opinion

Weinreich v. Johnston

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1889No. 12624PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

The respondents, H. Weinreich and F. Raschen, as partners doing business under the firm name of Weinreich & Co., sued the appellant in the court below on a promissory note and upon an account. The complaint contains the necessary averments showing the partnership, and a compliance with the statute with reference to the filing of a certificate thereof with the county clerk, and alleges in the first count that the defendant executed to the plaintiffs the promissory note sued on, and in the second count, the purchase of goods and merchandise, and the amount due therefor.

The defendant denied all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCord v. SealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Cotes v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Curry v. RoundtreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shain v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Williams v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Ahlers v. SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Chase v. Van Camp Sea Food Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Chan Yo Chow v. SingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API