Legal Opinion

Ahlers v. Smiley

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1912No. L.A. No. 2890PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment against them and from an order denying their motion for a new trial. The action was one for damages for the violation of a certain contract. Ahlers & East were copartners engaged in the business, among other things, of manufacturing ice. Defendants, also copartners, were retailers of ice. By the terms of the contract, the firm of Ahlers & East agreed to furnish to defendants at the price of four dollars per ton all of the ice necessary for defendants to supply their customers. Under this agreement the plaintiff copartnership continued to furnish and the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Mount Tecarte Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hale v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Stewart v. SpauldingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Williams v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Sobelman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Shaw v. BushCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Oakland California Towel Co. v. SivilsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API