State v. Meagher
Supreme Court of Vermont
Action of debt on a recognizance. Heard on demurrer, December Term, 1882, Veazey, J., presiding. Demurrer overruled, and judgment for tlie plaintiff. The petition for a writ of certiorari, mandamus, See., was dated January 23, 1884. The other facts as to this petition are sufficiently stated in the opinion. . The declaration in the original action averred that the State’s attorney made complaint against the defendant Meagher for the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor.
Read the full summary
Action of debt on a recognizance. Heard on demurrer, December Term, 1882, Veazey, J., presiding. Demurrer overruled, and judgment for tlie plaintiff. The petition for a writ of certiorari, mandamus, See., was dated January 23, 1884. The other facts as to this petition are sufficiently stated in the opinion. . The declaration in the original action averred that the State’s attorney made complaint against the defendant Meagher for the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor. The writ was dated November 20, 1882; and the defendant was notified to appear before the municipal court of the village of…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Royce, Ch. J.
This is a petition addressed to the Supreme Court praying that a writ of certiorari, mandamus, or other appropriate w'rit, may issue, directed to the municipal court of Bennington, commanding that court to certify to the Supreme Court the files, proceedings, minutes, records, and purported records of that court, in the cause in which the said Meagher was prosecuted before said court on the complaint of the State’s attorney and the said Healey became recognized with Meagher for his appearance in court, in order that they may be inspected in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crawford v. CheneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1840
- Bryant v. PemberSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. . HiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909