Legal Opinion

Ahlberg v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided December 9, 1991No. Civ. 3-90-0038PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MAGNUSON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the court upon defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff is Daniel Ahlberg, individually and as administrator of Metropolitan Neurosurgery Pension Plan and Profit Sharing. Ahlberg seeks to recover $10,725.92, plus interest and costs, which was paid to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as payment for excise tax deficiencies. For the following reasons the court denies defendant’s motion for summary judgment and grants summary judgment for the plaintiff sua sponte.

II. FACTS

The following facts are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Helvering v. BlissSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Dick Dickeson and Beth Weaver v. Deloyd Quarberg and the Board of County Commissioners of Hot Springs County, WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. National Expositions, Inc. v. Crowley Maritime CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. Caravan Refrigerated Cargo, Inc. v. YaquintoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. Ludden v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chapman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API