Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided March 26, 1997No. Docket Nos. 20342-94, 20363-94, 20560-94Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MILO G. AND SARAH E. CHAPMAN, ET AL., 1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Chapman v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 20342-94, 20363-94, 20560-94

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1997-147; 1997 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 170; 73 T.C.M. (CCH) 2405;

March 26, 1997March 20, 1997, Filed

Joann K. Beck, for petitioners.

Kathey I. Shaw, for respondent.

HAMBLEN

HAMBLEN

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HAMBLEN, Judge: By four separate notices of deficiency, respondent determined deficiencies, additions to tax, and penalties in regard to petitioners' Federal income tax as follows:

Milo G. and Sarah E.…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Jack E. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  3. Moline Properties, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API