Thomas v. Jackson Hewitt, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Kathleen Ann Keough, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Nancee and Paul Thomas, appeal the trial court’s decision granting the motion of defendant-appellee, Jackson Hewitt, Inc. to dismiss. Finding no merit to the appeal, we affirm.
{¶ 2} In September 2009, Nancee Thomas filed a putative class-action complaint against Jackson Hewitt. The class action was brought by Thomas individ*734ually and on behalf of a class of Ohio residents who had sought Jackson Hewitt’s assistance in obtaining a refund-anticipation loan (“RAL”). The complaint alleged that Jackson Hewitt violated Ohio’s Credit Services…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Byrd v. FaberOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Perrysburg Township v. City of RossfordOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Hickman v. CapotsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Cleveland v. Embassy Realty Invs., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018